UNESCO CENTER FOR WOMEN AND PEACE IN THE BALKAN COUNTRIES Program “Social Development” “The role of the women in the beginning
of 21th century” WOMEN IN MODERN SOCIETIES FROM PERIPHERIES TO CENTER RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES, PARTICIPATION, EMPOWERMENT |
Thessaloniki,
25 May 2001
In the beginning of the 21st century, women
are faced with a number of challenges. There is an apparent need to explore new
ways of settling differences, create a more humane society, protect the
environment and make an effort for a fairer distribution of power and
resources, that is, to identify a new political culture. It is becoming obvious
that no problems of our times can ever be adequately solved without the
contribution, the ideas and the political participation of women.
The socioeconomic conditions having prevailed over the
centuries and the different spheres that the two sexes have found themselves -
men in the public sphere and women in the private one – resulted in the
development of two separate worlds with different value-systems. There are,
therefore, two different cultures based upon different value-systems. Women, as
a whole, are historically associated with non-violence; their value-system is
associated with dialogue, compromise, reconciliation and settling-up of differences
by peaceful means. This value-system can hopefully provide an alternative to
the current culture of violence, whilst at the same time it can help the
development of a new political culture, that of peace, co-operation and respect
for differences. It is estimated that if the politics adopted women’s values,
there would be more social solidarity amongst people and nations, there would
be no bloodshed wars and conflicts due to religious fanatism and extreme
nationalism; additionally, there would be more awareness about social issues
related to quality of life such as protection of the environment, social policy
and welfare, health care, education, and combating of drug-use.
Examining
women's role in the 21st century, we have to consider the new environment
created by the rapid technological change, the widening application of
information and communication technologies. Women's role can be profound in
this context. Concerns regarding the impact of ITCs are twofold: the first has
to do with employment, that is whether these technologies actually destroy more
jobs than they create; the second has to do with democracy and equality, that
is whether the complexity of these technologies will widen the gap between
developed and less developed areas, between the rich and the poor, men and
women and between the young and the old. To meet these concerns we need public
policies which can help us reap the benefits of technological progress and
achieve a fair distribution of the potential for prosperity. Information
Society should be about people and
should be used for people and by
people to unlock the power of information, not to create inequalities between
the information rich and the information poor. Considering women’s sensitivity
and awareness to social issues, most possibly in their hands, Information
Society can become a tool for the creation of an inclusive society.
One of the most important consequences of the new
technological progress is, undoubtedly, the phenomenon of globalization and by
extension the trade liberalization. Available evidence indicates that the
ongoing process of trade liberalization combined with the overall impact of the
processes of globalisation are increasing economic inequalities between
countries as well as between different economic groups within countries,
between men and women and among women as they form part of the differently
privileged economic groups.
The gender dimension of trade liberalisation shows
both positive and negative affects. It is a fact that trade liberalisation has
opened up new opportunities especially for educated and younger women with
professional skills in developed countries and has led to access to new, better
paying employment and opportunities previously unavailable to women. The impact
of trade expansion on women’s economic activity has wider human and
developmental benefits. It gives women greater control of income, although not
always absolute individual control. Women’s tend to have more family oriented
expenditures patterns than men, so that an improvement in women’s
income-earning capability has lead to greater investment in the human capital
of children, in their education possibilities and their livelihoods.
But all that glitters is not gold. The processes of
structural change to the global economy also carry with them new risks.
a. One of the main factors that threaten the progress
of women is poverty. A prominent
characteristic of women in poverty is social and economic inequality leading to
greater vulnerability to the risk of being marginalised and further
impoverished in times of economic upheaval.
The Beijing Platform for action refers to the
phenomenon of “feminisation of poverty” declaring that
-
Women’s poverty-income
is more severe than men’s poverty-income.
-
Over time, the incidence
of income poverty among women is increasing compared to that among men.
The international community has already agreed that
poverty is a problem in North and South and that its eradication requires
democratic participation and changes in economic structures in order to ensure
more equitable distribution of wealth. In addition women often do not have the
same access as men to education, training, credit, technology and information,
which are necessary to take advantage of new economic opportunities arising from
trade liberalisation. In order to favor women’s full integration in the global
economy is necessary 1. To promote legislative and administrative reforms to
give women equal rights with men to economic resources, including access to
ownership control over land, other forms of ownership, access to the
information and communications technologies, access to savings and credit
mechanisms and institutions; 2. To adopt and maintain macro-economic policies
and development strategies that addresses the needs of women in poverty.
b. Women are particularly affected by unemployment and
under employment together with many forms of discriminations in the labour
market. Trade might increase women’s access to labour market, but women in most
developing countries are staying locked in at relatively low levels of pay and
skills. Women are over-represented in the work places where conditions are poor
and wages are low and under represented in managing and decision – making
positions. For other women liberalised trade can mean loss of labour rights:
such as social benefits and the right to organise; given that women tend to be
concentrated in low-wage industries their relative power also tends to be low.
For women it is difficult to separate their rights as workers from their rights
as equal citizens. Very little will be achieved by ending discrimination at
work if women are denied the right to education; or by bringing about equal pay
if women do not have the right to control their earnings.
-
In the EU as a whole,
women doing the same work as a man are paid only 76% of the gross hourly wage
men earn
-
The employment rate
for women is 51,2%, compared to 70,8% for men
-
83% of part-time workers
in the EU are women. (Eurostat, 1998/99)
The EU’s
mandate is to mainstream gender equality in employment policies however, this
requires effective tools to implement this principle, such as the use of
specific indicators, increased use of benchmarking and improved gender
diseggregated statistic. Social development must also be a crucial cornerstone
of trade policy. The EU, the international organisations and the governments to
act to eliminate pay discriminations, and reinforce legislation on this field.
In addition, Commissioner for Employment and Social
Affairs Anna Diamantopoulou, speaking before informal Council of Ministers
meeting, in the beginning of 2001, challenged Member States to enforce rules on
equal pay and conditions for men and women in Europe or to risk equality rules
becoming a dead letter. She appealed to Member States to “gender-comb” their
tax and social security systems in order to break down disincentives to full
participation of women in the jobs market.. She added “Gender equality in tax
and social security systems is also essential for the sustainability of the systems
in the future. To adapt what J.F. Kennedy said, don’t ask what social
protection systems can do for women. Imagine what women can do for social
protection systems if they participate fully in the labour market”.