Network of Parliamentary Committees on Equal Opportunities |
|
EU CONVENTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
|
Copenhagen, 23/11/2002 |
Intervention
by Anna Karamanou MEP/ Chairperson, E.P. Committee on Women's Rights & Equal Opportunities |
We
are here in this meeting to unite and mobilise our forces, to be able to jointly
influence the work in shaping the
future of Europe.
Our
Committee´s efforts to influence the process of building the future
of Europe has been made, as you know, mainly through two meetings in the European
Parliament, on 22 May and on 2 October. Besides Parliamentarians, all Members
of the Convention were invited, and representatives from a number of NGOs
and the civil society, experts and representatives of the Commission participated
as well. In the first meeting, Ana Palacio, Member of the Presidium of the Convention and now Minister
for Foreign Affairs in Spain, took the lead in the meeting. In the second
meeting we had the privilege of having two Working Group Chairs on the podium,
Gisela Stuart and Klaus Hansch.
After
each of the meetings, we have summarised the conclusions in concrete demands
on the Convention, which I have sent
to Giscard d´Estaing, with copies to all Members of the Convention.
As
you know, we have not been alone in our efforts. We have had a lot of support
in contributions from lobby organisations, such as the European Women´s
Lobby, legal experts, such as European Women Lawyers Association and legal
experts of the Commission, researchers, the European Commission Advisory Committee
on Equal Opportunities etc. All voices have given the same message: gender equality must have a prominent place
in the Convention on the Future of Europe.
The
response from the male-dominated Convention has been both disappointing and
worrying. It was with surprise and concern we found that in the preliminary draft Constitutional Treaty on 28 October,
there is a complete lack of mentioning
of gender issues. We fear now that what we have achieved so far on gender
equality in the Treaty, which of course must be further strengthened in the
future Treaty, will not even be maintained and that instead, we will go backwards.
In
this situation, our Committee felt that it should act strongly and immediately.
We decided to prepare a draft declaration that this meeting could consider
to adopt. The draft was prepared by a Working Group chaired by Heidi Hautala
and consisting of Members of the Committee as well as of the Convention -
Lone Dybkjaer, Hanja Maij-Weggen, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann and Anne Van Lancker.
The draft was discussed
and agreed by all other Members of our delegation to this Network meeting
- Miet Smet, Joke Swiebel and Helena Torres Marques and me of course.
On
the substance, may I just highlight a few
issues I feel are of major importance.
First
and foremost, the "acquis communautaire"
on gender policy, both in terms of substantive law and competences, must be
fully maintained and strengthened.
On
the Constitutional structure, the Charter of Fundamental Rights should be
incorporated in such a way that its advantages in so far as gender equality
is concerned, are preserved. Gender equality should be included among the
basic values of the Union. Its promotion
as well as the elimination of inequalities should be an objective and task
of the Union.
On
the Union policies, Gender mainstreaming should be incorporated in all policy
areas, at all levels, at all stages and by all participants in political acitivity.
An
appropriate legal basis in the Treaty to fight all forms of violence against
women has since long been an important request of
our Committee.
Last
but not least, in view of the forthcoming elections of the European Parliament
in June 2004, I would like to stress, finally, the fundamental necessity of
a balanced representation of women and men in this important body. The European
Parliament should be a good model of democracy for all the Europeans Institutions.
You
have seen in our draft declaration that we have chosen, at this stage, not
to propose any concrete articles to be contained in a Constitutional Treaty.
I shall leave comments on that to our representatives in the Convention here
present, but my own clear view is that such a concrete work should be done
as soon as possible, in order to serve as an input to the next draft Constitutional
Treaty which we can foresee to be published in January.